Prickless Blood Sugar Monitor Review

Prickless Blood Sugar Monitor

A diagnosis of diabetes isn’t like other health conditions. People with diabetes end up with an often lifelong routine of checking and monitoring their blood sugar at home. This occurs because regular monitoring is important to determining how far outside normal blood sugar levels a diabetic’s has become, which can dictate medicine schedules and mealtimes, too. Unfortunately, this monitoring also means that oftentimes, a diagnosis of diabetes also means pricking the fingertip sometimes multiple times each day in order to obtain the blood sample needed for testing. While often only mildly painful, over time fingertips can become sore and more sensitive, leading many to look towards available options in a prickless blood sugar monitor.

A typical blood sugar monitor is a small device that accepts testing strips that a diabetic’s blood has been placed on which provides readings of blood glucose levels. The devices vary in terms of cost, accuracy and consistency. Additionally, the strips that the devices use also vary in terms of cost and shelf life, making choosing a blood sugar monitor a little more complicated than it may seem on the surface. Some monitors can cost upwards of $100.00, and some models have test strips that are costly, or expire after a limited amount of time. In addition to the discomfort associated with using them, these other factors also contribute to the desire of many for a prickless blood sugar monitor.

Technology, it seems, may be starting to catch up and offer some alternatives for people with diabetes who are regularly monitoring their blood sugar. A prickless blood sugar monitor that offers continuous monitoring of glucose levels without the pain and discomfort of pricking the fingers is available for some individuals. With these advances, people can finally skip the blood sugar test altogether, knowing that their glucose levels are being continually monitored, providing real time and accurate monitoring. These devices, called continuous glucose testing units, offer a blood sugar test reading much more often than is practical with traditional prick devices and does so without the discomfort and hassle of traditional monitors. Frequency of testing as is possible with a prickless blood sugar monitor like these is fantastic for people whose glucose levels fluctuate regularly, like occurrences such as elevations in blood sugar levels after eating or a drop in levels following exercise.

A continuous glucose testing unit works via sensors that are placed under the skin. These sensors transmit information in real time to a device that is worn on the body of a person with diabetes. The benefits to this prickless blood sugar monitor are numerous, but one of the most impressive is the alarm feature that signals when the blood sugar levels normal range is breached, where glucose has become too high or too low. Instead of waiting until the next time a prick test is practical, a person can know immediately if their blood sugar has become elevated or begins to fall.

There are some downsides to this new prickless blood sugar monitor that uses under the skin sensors to record and monitor blood sugar levels. For instance, it’s incredibly expensive. People who found monitors and the recurrent purchasing of test strips costly will likely find this type of glucose monitoring impractical from a cost perspective. Additionally, the under skin monitors have to be replaced regularly, as in every three to seven days. But, the worst part might be the fact that this type of prickless blood sugar monitor does not negate the use of regular testing monitors. The simple truth is that when it comes to dosing for insulin, a traditional prick device is the best blood sugar monitor available in terms of accuracy, and it’s still used by people with under the skin glucose sensors in order to confirm readings and provide information about accurate insulin dosing.

It seems that currently, although sometimes inconvenient and painful, the options available to diabetics in terms of a prickless blood sugar monitor are still in their infancy, leaving standard devices still the best solution for accurate and convenient blood sugar monitoring. However, current technologies are being developed that could change all of that very, very soon. For instance, a team of researchers in Hong Kong is currently working a device that could read sugar levels in the blood with an infrared beam (no invasive steps involved) and transmit that information to a device no bigger than a cell phone. Currently, however, it seems that a true cost effective, practical, prickless blood sugar monitor is still out of reach, although it may be on the horizon.